In Germany for the time being, there are no other the controversial anchor centres for refugees.
According to a survey by the German press Agency, no state is currently planning such a centre. The device is basically in the black-red coalition agreement. The first seven centres were passed in Bavaria in August, at the Start, only Saxony and the Saarland, the idea was followed by centers in Dresden and Lebach. The word anchor is for(the future), k(ommunale distribution), E(decision) and R(ückführung). All the important authorities will be represented; a short ways to speed up the asylum procedure.
The majority of the countries refer to the fact that you have facilities with comparable structures, without the label to the anchor center. Interior Minister Horst Seehofer (CSU), had to be centers in his “master plan on Migration”, adopted at the conference of interior Ministers at the end of November self-printing: One could argue endlessly over the door – or say: “We have a total consensus in the function of these facilities.”
The interior Ministers conference had shown that the Federal government and the country to pull the issue of further development of the recording facilities of a strand, said Schleswig-Holstein’s Minister of the interior Hans-Joachim Grote (CDU). The structure of the arrival centres in Schleswig-Holstein fulfilled already to a large extent the desired requirements.
The lower Saxony Ministry of the interior pointed out that, in the arrivals centres in Bad Fallingbostel in the lüneburg Heath and Bramsche near Osnabrück, all relevant authorities are represented. “Here’s what happens for quite some time, what Mr Seehofer for the anchor centres wishes, according to our assessment, even more and better,” said lower Saxony’s interior Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD).
North Rhine-Westphalia is not involved in the pilot project. The “right idea” to link all actors in the asylum procedure in the sense of the acceleration in both directions, will be implemented in North Rhine-Westphalia, the FDP-led refugee Ministry.
in Brandenburg, the SPD Minister of the interior Karl-Heinz Schröter was open to anchor malls. The mitregierende the left party, however, has reservations. Group chief Ralf Christoffers, had declared that such centres were from the point of view of his party, the basic law.
Saxony-Anhalt maintains its position to bundle with its Central point of contact for asylum-seekers in Halberstadt, almost all of the functions of the anchor center. A concept prior to seeing the Expansion of a second location in Stendal. A Change was not planned.
From Hamburg States that there is with the 2016 opened and, in the meantime, some of the components of the extended arrival center is practically a function of the same Equivalent. Also Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has according to own statements with his first recording facility in Nostorf-Horst, via a device similar to the Bavarian anchor centers.
In the state of Hesse had already welcomed in the past, the Initial reception centre in Giessen fulfill all the functions that make up a anchor the centre. You’ll stay as it is – it will change neither the concept nor the name of the device something.
The state government of Rhineland-Palatinate has rejected anchor centers from the beginning. She sees the model of an integrated Reception with all the stakeholders under one roof in Rhineland-Palatinate, already successfully implemented. Also, Bremen, Berlin and Thuringia had already rejected early, anchor centres.