The defence Commissioner of the Bundestag, Hans-Peter Bartels, holds a wide-ranging debate on the future reactions of the Bundeswehr in the event of Cyber-attacks is necessary.
that experts should be involved outside of the military leadership and the policy, said Bartels, the German press Agency. Greater knowledge would have to be established. “You have to know what you are talking about,” asked Bartels. Yet, much is unclear.
Cyber-attacks on States and important parts of the infrastructure are considered to be a significant risk and can run out of hostile States, state-supported Hacker gangs, or organized crime. Ambiguity as to the authorship can complicate reactions to it – such as the disruption of enemy IT systems. The Bundeswehr is currently expanding its own capabilities in the so – called Cyber-and information room (CIR), to be able to take action.
“This is still a debate, if possible, with the involvement of people who are not so expert, because you can say accident free Cyber, but it takes a deeper understanding of the things that are technically possible,” said the military representative.
retribution was probably the only way to Cyber-attacks. “We need to see that we organize a well-informed debate. Since the Department of defense can develop a role to play, but also scientists, or writers, of the scenarios.”
In the modernization of the Bundeswehr and the procurement of missing equipment, the development goes according to Bartels in the right direction. For the armed forces it meant at the Moment but a double burden to cope with foreign operations and the increased demands on the Alliance for defence of Nato.
“That is again practiced, but it is still missing in the Material. I can only repeat what they have discussed in the last annual reports. The huge gaps are still there,” said Bartels. But: “let There be light is recognizable, and that is not the oncoming train, but the improvement of the situation.” So money will be spent for new projects. “But the soldiers suffer from the fact that you must now shoulder a double burden, with the same Equipment that was too little for the old Situation, when there were only missions abroad. Today, it goes to foreign missions plus collective defense.”
Bartels also spoke out in favour of the success of military operations abroad to check better. “What we have, to date, an Evaluation, for example, of the Afghanistan mission on the national level or at the Nato level.”
also Necessary is a security policy debate all four years, “regularly and systematically” and not along individual decisions to foreign missions should move would be. “It would be good if the Bundestag could result in the legislature, a great deal of discussion to the external security of the Federal Republic of Germany. Perhaps on the basis of a then every four years, to be submitted to white paper,” he said. Each government should develop a white paper.
The debate is to be conducted in Germany, but unlike in the UK or in the USA. “The basic difference is: We think in structures, to avoid that military is used. The Anglo-Saxons, and also our French friends think in terms of missions, for which you need skills.”